Currently, when we list features, they’re listed with just the name (or the description, if that field is specified) in the first column. This means that method names and property names are indistinguishable. I think this could be a problem that leads to some confusion while reading the compatibility tables.
We should either be specifying a description that adds the closing parentheses to method names or find some way to cause the closing parens to be added at render time. Or add a “method” flag to indicate that a feature is a method. Something like that.
Curious if anyone else finds this to be a thing while reading long tables…?